olin_piclist@embedinc.com"OlinLathrop" wrote: > Gerhard Fiedler wrote: >> Have you tried the SMTP server that comes with Win2k? AFAIK fits all >> your reqs, and it's already there. > > I wasn't aware Windows 2000 came with a outgoing SMTP server. I'll > look into that. Would you happen to have pointers on where in the > overwhelming pile of Microsoft documentation to start looking? See Adam's message; this should you get started. Then go to Control Panel > Administrative Tools > Internet Information Services, where you might have an FTP server, a web server and an SMTP server. Stop the ones you don't want; right-click on the ones you want to configure and check out their Properties dialogs. Help is available for most dialogs; this should get you somewhere. If not, searching for specific terms usually helps me. This is a standard tool, out there for a long time. >> There's also http://www.postcastserver.com/ (no experience, but looks >> like it is what you want, if you can't get the Win2k server going). > > That is one of the ones I tried and gave up on. It's a mess. The > interface is fine and it supposedly does what I want, but it just > doesn't quite work right. It's very slow and eats up a lot of CPU > for no apparent reason, can't deliver some messages for no apparent > reason, and there wasn't a obvious way to have it give up on messages > after a certain number of tries, clear them out of the queue, and > send a error reply. Wow... I wonder why somebody bothers to publish something like this. > I have meanwhile found something called QK SMTP server. It is > supposedly configurable to do exactly what I want. It even has the > additional nice feature that after a configurable number of failed > attempts to send a message directly it can fall back on delivering it > to other outgoing SMTP servers. That's what I have installed at this > point. The current problem with it is that although the GUI > interface has a checkbox for "Run at Windows startup", it doesn't, or > perhaps it tries and then craps out for some reason without leaving > any trace. It seems to work well when I run it manually after > logging in to Windows, but that's no good long term. There are tools to run normal applications as Windows services. If their built-in mechanism doesn't work, you could try this. Gerhard -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist