Unfortunately I can't risk a battery in this application.... -marc On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Tamas Rudnai wrote: > I think a backup battery would be cheaper and maybe even the footprint > would be smaller. The only drawback is that you have to remember > replacing that every year or so. > > Tamas > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Marc Nicholas > wrote: > > All this talk of cheap UPSes is timely... > > > > I'd like to be able to provide a few seconds of +5vdc to a device so that > > when its main power line fails it gets to "finish what its doing" (which > it > > will if it is no longer being fed data, but needs a second or two to do > so). > > > > Super or ultra caps come to mind, but I've never worked with them and > some > > casual Googling hasn't turned up too much of interest. > > > > Any suggestions on where to start or tips? Obviously I don't want to end > up > > with blown caps and/or blown device! > > > > TIA. > > > > -marc > > > > P.S: Oh, power draw for the device is 150mA nominal....so hoping I can > just > > do something with a Schottky, resistors and cap! > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > > > -- > /* www.mcuhobby.com */ int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s="/* > www.mcuhobby.com */ int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s=%s%s%s, > q=%s%s%s%s,s,q,q,a=%s%s%s%s,q,q,q,a,a,q); }", > q="\"",s,q,q,a="\\",q,q,q,a,a,q); } > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist