On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Gerhard Fiedler wrote: > olin_piclist@embedinc.com"OlinLathrop" wrote: > > > To summarize, here are the requirements: > > > > * Must run on Windows 2000. > > > > * Must NOT establish a server on ports 25 or 110, or must be > > configurable to avoid those ports. > > > > * Does not need security in accepting mail. It will be behind a router > > that will not expose its ports externally. > > > > * May be free or commercial. If not free, must have at least 14 day > > free evaluation period. > > > > * May use SMTP to receive mail to be forwarded, but may also require > > some alternate interface, like running a executable per message. > > > > * Does not need a queuing system, POP3 server, etc. Just needs to > > forward messages to MX machines of target domains. > > > > Any suggestions? > > Have you tried the SMTP server that comes with Win2k? AFAIK fits all > your reqs, and it's already there. > > There's also http://www.postcastserver.com/ (no experience, but looks > like it is what you want, if you can't get the Win2k server going). > > Other than that, a search for "sendmail windows" gives a number of links > for Windows ports of the Unix sendmail program. Oh no, anything but sendmail! I used to use sendmail years ago on a linux box. Very hard to configure even with The book of words. Tons and tons of options, setting AND LOOPHOLES!!!! Moved to Postfix and haven't regretted it once. Ok I haven't found a windows port for you but if you ever decide to use a dedicated box (or even a virtual one inside your real windows one) then you should seriously consider Postfix. BTW you don't need a big machine running the latest release of Linux to use postfix, you can comfortably use an old resource limited PC running FreeBSD without big fancy graphics (this goes for a virtual box as well!!!) Regards Sergio Masci -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist