Em 4/2/2010 07:32, Matt Rhys-Roberts escreveu:
> While getting to grips with C18 quite happily, I discovered =

> (http://users.aber.ac.uk/auj/voidmain.shtml) that using "void main =

> (void)" , as most C18 demo code does, is frowned upon.
>
> I'm asking any seasoned C18 philosophers out there; is this cause for =

> concern? I don't know enough about C yet to predict whether this is =

> really an issue or not, purely in the case of using C18 for PIC developme=
nt.
>
> Regards,
> Matt
>   =

>

Don't worry, PIC18 doesn't use any return value from main(). If "main"
ever returns, the "_startup" routine will execute "return 0", which will
underflow the stack and generate a reset, unless your call stack is not
empty when main returns.


Best regards,

Isaac
__________________________________________________
Fa=E7a liga=E7=F5es para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger =

http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ =


-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist