Matt Rhys-Roberts wrote:
> While getting to grips with C18 quite happily, I discovered 
> (http://users.aber.ac.uk/auj/voidmain.shtml) that using "void main 
> (void)" , as most C18 demo code does, is frowned upon.
> 
> I'm asking any seasoned C18 philosophers out there; is this cause for 
> concern? I don't know enough about C yet to predict whether this is 
> really an issue or not, purely in the case of using C18 for PIC development.

AFAIK this technically not a problem (your application will work OK), 
but it simply is not standard C. IMHO this is a deficiency of the C 
standard, but it is a fact of life.

-- 

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist