Those are new silicons, no surprise to me, will be full of bugs. And, as usual, none of the Microchip silicon design engineer will have a clue what's the cause (which means it will be very quite after the issue reported) for a long time. Especially the PIC32 core is from outside of the company, so there is always someone else to blame. Funny N. Au Group Electronics, http://www.AuElectronics.com http://www.AuElectronics.com/products http://augroups.blogspot.com/ ________________________________ From: Xiaofan Chen To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sent: Fri, January 15, 2010 9:42:57 AM Subject: Re: [PIC] MCHPFSUSB USB stack bug On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Philip Pemberton wrote: > And it's not a "pureblood" 8051 -- it's an overclocked "turbo" 8051 > variant. Same instruction set, but the 12-cycles-per-instruction divider > has been dropped to 4-cycles, and it'll do 12MIPS (at an Fclk of 48MHz). > At the very least, it'll match a PIC for raw performance, and with the > GPIF module it can potentially beat it. A USB PIC24 will beat that. A USB PIC32 will beat that handsomely. -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist