In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, skynugget wrote:

yea sorry about that, haste makes waste. i should have explained better. i was working on something else, that i scrapped, because of this.  though this code is incomplete, i would think it should compile given that i would have remembered to put the following in the example:
[code]
string var byte(4)
[/code]

i tried to come up something simple basically to ask if its a bug, or if im just dumb and don't get it the syntax

i thought you could return a max of 5 bytes from a function, and the get stored in __PARAM1 thru __PARAM5  
i dint know param9 and param13 existed.. i kinda thought it was a bug... but ive been known to be pritty dense sometimes.

---------- End of Message ----------


You can view the post on-line at:
http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=1&m=414782#m414864

Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com

The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2010 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)