On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Marcel Birthelmer
<marcelb.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> =A0So... what to interpret? Tokenized Basic? Pascal p-code? Java?
>> ...
>
> FORTH! The answer is always FORTH.

How fast is Forth on PIC? Forth was designed onto a stack based
machine, was not it? And PIC (mid-range) need to emulate a stack using
indirect addressing, so I thought it might not be very fast but I
might wrong? Or maybe not slower than any other interpreter?

BTW: BasicStamp is doing this Basic interpreter thingy on , never
tried that though:
http://www.parallax.com/tabid/295/Default.aspx

And PICBASIC seems to be very similar to that but on the 'real' PIC:
http://www.comfile.co.kr/english2/study/pbmanualf.html

Tamas


> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>



-- =

/* www.mcuhobby.com */ int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s=3D"/*
www.mcuhobby.com */ int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s=3D%s%s%s,
q=3D%s%s%s%s,s,q,q,a=3D%s%s%s%s,q,q,q,a,a,q); }",
q=3D"\"",s,q,q,a=3D"\\",q,q,q,a,a,q); }

-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist