On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote: > Since it is a macro (which always is expanded into real code) > it will work. There will be one BSF instruction for each > "call" (which isn't a real call, of course) of the macro. > It would not have worked if the BSF was in e.g. a normal > subroutine (that is CALL'ed). Ok, perfect. I thought that was the case. I must admit I totally forgot about checking the output listing. Thanks everyone! Josh -- A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. -Douglas Adams -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist