>> Should not they ban all special clothings in other sports, like funny >> helmets on cyclists, the curved poles used by skiers and even the >> shoes with spikes used by many different sports like in soccer, golf, >> running etc? > The general rule seems to be that those things which enhance the sport > tend to be allowed (I'd definitely include spiked shoes in that > category, as they help athletes put down the power and prevent injury, But some athletes (notably Kenyan's AFAIR) at one stage ran world records in BARE feet against players in footwear of their choice. (Dimming memory offers ?Kipshank Keno?). It seems there to be that many benefit from the innovation BUT it's not a necessary one for success. Some sports have controls re what is allowed in order to keep the sport standardised. Golf is an excellent example. A golf course is standardised to par 72. It is expected that a good player accustomed to wearing plus 4's and using wooden shafted clubs would, after getting over the culture shock, have about the same handicap with modern equipment on the same course, once he got used to the new (inferior ? :-) ) equipment. Any new introductions in golf which genuinely lift the ability to perform are banned once this is proven. Two examples are the "between the legs" putter ("Sam Sneed"?) and a version of golf ball with a definite improvement in aerodynamic carry. Once these were shown to definitely work their faces were seen no more. Certainly some innovations may work for some people but be of low enough mean effect as to keep them legal. There are probably ways of optimising equipment that would help the Tyger* that would not overly assist the average player. When it comes to swim suits - PERHAPS copyright, branding, advertising and IP rights are part of the issue. If you can only buy the gear from one supplier who has patented the system then the sport is subject to commercial distortion. (As opposed to eg shoes with swooshes on them that perhaps only apparently make you run faster :-) ). Russell * Blake's imagery seems entirely apposite to him. I suspect he's an alien - closest golfer to Beetlebomb that I ever heard of. Sometimes doesn't make the cut. Just makes the cut and YOU can almost always forget winning. What if he played like that consistently? -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist