Alan B. Pearce a =E9crit :
> The advertising on the Microchip web site already says the ICD2 is not =

> recommended for use with new devices. Due to various limitations with the =

> internal hardware of the ICD2 I doubt that it will continue to be support=
ed =

> for new devices. =

Ok
> Also note that Microchip are running a program to trade in =

> an ICD2 and get 25% off a new debug tool, such as an ICD3 or Real ICE. =

It is only for ICD3 not for Real ICE, right?
> Essentially yes, but when you look at the Real ICE feature list it does h=
ave =

> significant extra features. The ICD3 is also a lot faster than the ICD2 a=
s =

> it can run at USB2 High Speed, where the ICD2 can run at only Full Speed, =

> and it has a lot more debugging features for the higher end target chips. =

>   =

but real ice have trace capability. It is really useful?

-- =

Artem =


-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist