> > bsf temp,intedg,w
> > xorwf option_reg
> [snip]
> 
> Since when did BSF accept a third parameter? How about this:
> 
>   MOVLW (1 << INTEDG)
>   XORWF OPTION_REG, F

Yes, that's what I intended

What I should have written was

bsf temp,intedg
movfw temp
xorwf option_reg

I was elbow-deep and focussing on disassembling a delicate gearbox


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist