Olin Lathrop wrote:
>> dynamic memory allocation (DMA)
>
> No!  Please don't use that abbreviation.  "DMA" already has a well known 
> and
> quite different meaning in the world of computing.  Let's not create more
> confusion.

Olin, I held out as long as I could, but writing out "dynamic memory 
allocation" every time got really old. We're not talking about Direct Memory 
Access, so there is not confusion in this context.

Vitaliy 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist