2009/10/8 Ruben J=F6nsson > If it can get allocated differently for different initializations it still > is > dynamic in nature since the memory needs and allocations are not set up > either > by the linker or the compiler but it is determined at run time. > > I think the key words here are "determined at run time". Even if it is > determined only once. > Dynamic, I agree, however, I would rather call it dynamic linking rather than dynamic memory handling. this is similar to a dynamic link library (DLL) so that the linker dows not know the final address of the API set, that will be determined runtime and only once when the program loaded. Tamas > > /Ruben > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Ruben J=F6nsson > AB Liros Electronic > Box 9124, 200 39 Malm=F6, Sweden > TEL INT +46 40142078 > FAX INT +46 40947388 > ruben@pp.sbbs.se > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- = http://www.mcuhobby.com -- = http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist