> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Vitaliy <piclist@maksimov.org> wrote:
> =

> > Olin Lathrop wrote:
> > >> FWIW, we use dynamic memory allocation in all of our current projects
> > >> (on 24H and 33F).
> > >>
> > >> ...
> > >>
> > >> Memory gets allocated during initialization and doesn't change.
> > >
> > > These two statements seem to be at odds with each other.
> >
> > How's so?
> >
> =

> If memory is allocated during initialization, then you have no dynamic
> memory allocation.
> =

> Tamas
> =


If it can get allocated differently for different initializations it still =
is =

dynamic in nature since the memory needs and allocations are not set up eit=
her =

by the linker or the compiler but it is determined at run time.

I think the key words here are "determined at run time". Even if it is =

determined only once.

/Ruben
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Ruben J=F6nsson
AB Liros Electronic
Box 9124, 200 39 Malm=F6, Sweden
TEL INT +46 40142078
FAX INT +46 40947388
ruben@pp.sbbs.se
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist