Isaac Marino Bavaresco wrote:
> If you don=B4t need to extract every bit of performance from the CPU, C is
> much faster to program and get things running. Besides, it is easy to
> port to different processors and maintain.
>
> If you are building an engine controller, which needs cycle-exact loops
> and timing, etc. then I would advise using assembly. For a calculator,
> with lots of user interaction and complicated logic it is better to use
> C, perhaps with some assembly routines for time intensive calculations.
>   =


Thank you to everyone for their input so far. In some ways, I'm now =

feeling that C may be a waste of time since I already program in =

assembler. What are the advantages of moving to C?

Going back to the project that prompted all this; does it sound =

reasonable to write assembly code for accessing an SD card and dealing =

with the FAT?
David...

-- =


___________________________________________
David Duffy        Audio Visual Devices P/L
Unit 8, 10 Hook St, Capalaba 4157 Australia
Ph: +61 7 38235717   Fax: +61 7 38234717
New Web: www.audiovisualdevices.com.au
___________________________________________

-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist