Define "large display areas", "expensive", and what type of
information you are displaying (graphics, text, numeric, etc).  Is a
display with multiple LCDs panelized ok, or does it have to be one
contiguous display?  Are existing 'cheap' LCD TVs too expensive?  If
graphical, what are the resolution requirements?

My understanding is that large digital paper displays are more
expensive than LCDs at the moment, and generally only used where
higher durability, low power, better readability, or no power to
display static content justifies the additional cost.  Only in mass
quantities and highly integrated embedded devices (ie, consumer e-book
readers) do the costs of E-Ink and similar drop down to below that of
LCDs

-Adam

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:37 PM, AGSCalabrese<agscal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:17 PM, AGSCalabrese<agscal@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I would be happy to find a cheeeep =A0B/W or two tone display. =A0It can
>> be as slow as snot in January and i don't care what the power
>> consumption is.
> Yes, I should expand my explanation of what I want. =A0I want large
> display areas. =A0If the display remained after power was removed that
> would be a bonus and is not required. =A0Update speeds can be very
> slow. =A0Updates can take seconds . =A0 Existing LCDs get expensive when
> they are big.
> Gus
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>

-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist