PicDude wrote:
> I just
> found the 16F1936, which is allegedly in full production (though none
> of my
> regular sources have it in stock).  I can get samples though.

That's one of the new enhanced PIC 16.

> Here's what's interesting...  compared to the F883, a lot is double
> (8k
> words prog mem,

So do other normal 16F PICs, like 16F886.

> I usually worry about very new technology, as I prefer proven
> reliability
> over fancy features

So use the 16F886, or 18F2620 if you need more memory, and let someone else
be the test pilot.  It's not clear what features exactly you are looking
for.

Standardizing on a single PIC accross apps is silly since the cost of moving
code between parts is pretty much free.  Even in small production
quantities, it makes sense to get the right PIC for the job.  I don't see
what trying to standardize on a generic PIC does for you unless you're
talking about buying 10 just to have around for quick hacks and testing.


********************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
(978) 742-9014.  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist