:: M = mega = 10**6 :: K = kilo = 10**3 :: m = milli = 10**-3 :: u = micro = 10**-6 (actually greek mu, but "u" is common for those :: of us without greek letters on the keyboard) :: n = nano = 10**-9 :: p = pico = 10**-12 Slightly off topic - I had a project redactored by a US hobby magazine because I used nF values rather than K's of pF. I have found (about 10 years ago) that some EE's in the US and Australia didn't use the nano descriptor, I was surprised when I was told it was a weird descriptor used by the the UK and Europe only. In fact, apart from Farnell and RS (for obvious reasons) no other supplier (at that time) used nano - .It is only recently that Jaycar and Tricky Dickies have listed capacitors in this way - Tandy (Radio Shack) never did. I also prefer (though don't use) the older cycles per second for frequency than Hertz. I think the original far more explanatory and is more understandable a concept for beginners. Colin -- cdb, colin@btech-online.co.uk on 27/07/2009 Web presence: www.btech-online.co.uk Hosted by: www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=7988359 -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist