Vis Naicker wrote:
> Other better programmers have lost countless hours debugging - and the
> reason is not that the language is not perfect, but that it is still
> little past version 1.0. Pascal is not an alternative - drop that
> pissing contest of C vs Pascal -  what should have happened is that C
> should have evolved by copying what is right in these other
> languages. And become strong and super resistant.

It may be tough to evolve C due to backwards compatibility concerns.  I
think a clean break is needed else there will be too much reluctance to fix
the little things.


********************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
(978) 742-9014.  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist