Terry Harris wrote:

>> I think I've been pretty clear about the fact that I was talking
>> about standard libraries (as the part you quoted spells out quite
>> literally), and in another part I mentioned that I'm talking about
>> the compiler seeing these libraries in source code form. 
> 
> Are you talking about effectively what Hi-Tech OCG does (or tries
> to)?

Yes, in a way, and Microsoft, and probably a number of other vendors.
While standard C and C++ are based on the notion of completely
independent translation units, we're talking about how things could (or
should) be, and nothing hinders us to dream ahead a bit :)

Gerhard
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist