William "Chops" Westfield <westfw <at> mac.com> writes:
> Furthermore, it appears to be a perpetual motion device, which I  
> understand is likely to cause immediate rejection.

Assuming it would serve a large US company's interests to file a perpetuum
mobile patent (of course well hidden in lawyerspeak), I wonder if they would get
away with it ^^. I'd be willing to bet for a yes. Maybe someone with a sense of
humor from IBM, Sandia, etc will make good on this some 1st of April.

Peter

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist