>John Chung wrote:
>> They do have a better understanding then I do about the
>> problem but here is a snippet from Mark.
...
>I thought you were complaining about a serious problem.  This
>doesn't seem like a big deal to work around.
...
>Again, if you really care, get a RealICE.  If it's not worth
>the few 100 $$ to you, then you obviously agree its a low
>priority issue too.

Well, I think the problem is that the ICD2 used to work properly, but the 
MPLAB code that drives it is now broken - and it is apparently going to take 
them an age to unbreak it!!! V10 to fix it? Shucks, we are still in the low 
V8 ...

Maybe v10 will be based on Java, and run on *nix as well as win****

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist