Yea, but it had major structural problem that were hopefully corrected a 
few years back. Need to get the history of Frank Lloyd Wright to see he 
wasn't that great, and much of the work was implemented by his underlies.

Russell McMahon wrote:
>> I would call it an efficiently constructed "Falling Water"
>>     
>
> Wright!
> *
>
>      Russell
>
> ________________________________
>
> * http://www.fallingwater.org/
>
> Bigger than average image
>
> http://www.wright-house.com/frank-lloyd-wright/fallingwater-pictures/large-fallingwater-photos/high-resolution/falling-water-fall-house-L.jpg
>
> Nicer (I think) view, but includes people
> http://blog.pennlive.com/midstate_impact/2008/01/_582581501092007.jpg
>
> Not too foul.
> But, not too focused :-(
> http://mediaroom.visitpa.com/files/hi_fallingwater.jpg
>
> Quite nice.
> But has feel of having been upsized from lower resolution image
> http://image10.webshots.com/11/9/31/29/135093129yOjvHp_fs.jpg
>   
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist