I own & use mikroelektronica Pascal. I like it. The support is great. The 
marketing plan is great: no charge for up grades. Nice IDE. Hardware 
available that allows really quick compile - test cycles. Unfortunately, it 
is (like all other embedded compilers) a limited subset of the "real" 
Pascal. It lacks the following:
With statements
Variant Records
A DEFINE compiler directive like c

and a few others.


John Ferrell  W8CCW

"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit of 
justice is no virtue."
-Barry Goldwater
"You don't get harmony when everybody sings the same note."
-Doug Floyd

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan B. Pearce" <Alan.B.Pearce@stfc.ac.uk>
To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist@mit.edu>
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: Re [PIC]using BREAK in 'C'


>> I think we all agree that's where we are today.  All my point is that
>> while we may be forced to use C today, we should complain about it
>> whenever possible.
>
> Complaining that their is no alternative does nothing useful. A better
> proposition would be to work with someone like Mikroelektronika who do a
> Pascal for PICs, to help them improve it, and maybe even port it to other
> processors, which may help it get the critical mass ...
>
> http://www.mikroe.com/en/compilers/mikropascal/pic/
>
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist