Gerhard Fiedler escreveu:
> What would be your suggestion as to what's better? And don't say
> "Pascal", because we all agree that "the" Pascal is not usable. So you
> need to specify exactly which Pascal... and here the trouble starts.
> There is not a usable Pascal... there was Turbo Pascal, there is Delphi,
> there is Apollo Pascal, there is this and that Pascal -- not a good
> starting point to argue for adoption of "Pascal". =

>   =


I like Pascal and I like C. For work I use C.

Don't forget FreePascal (<http://www.freepascal.org/>), it is free and
run on lots of platforms (excerpt from the web-site):


    *  arm
          o Linux
          o Windows CE
    * intel/i386
          o Dos (GO32v2 extender)
          o FreeBSD (FreeBSD 6.x and 7.x)
          o Linux
          o Mac OS X
          o OS/2
          o Win32, Win64 and WinCE (Windows 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP,
Vista)
    * powerpc
          o Linux
          o Mac OS X
    * powerpc64
          o Linux
    * sparc
          o Linux
    * amd64/x86_64
          o Linux
          o Windows 64-bit

Regards,

Isaac
__________________________________________________
Fa=E7a liga=E7=F5es para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger =

http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ =


-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist