> Hi,
> =

> What happened with good old analog debouncer? (You just need a simple
> RC low-pass there for each switch)
> =

> My idea comes from "lets save every possible bit of memory" kind of
> ... Meaning, why wasting memory on debouncer code if you can just
> debounce it with 2-3 extra components/switch?
> =

> Sincerely,
> Alex.
> =


Why waste components if you can do it with zero parts (besides the processo=
r, =

which is already there anyway)?

/Ruben

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Ruben J=F6nsson
AB Liros Electronic
Box 9124, 200 39 Malm=F6, Sweden
TEL INT +46 40142078
FAX INT +46 40947388
ruben@pp.sbbs.se
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist