On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:16 AM, William "Chops" Westfield wrote: > You may find that overall weight savings is reduced slightly and > reliability and ease of construction is MUCH increased by using SMT > components on a thin/small PCB. At least this seems to have been the > conclusion off in the micro-indoor-RC area. Wire is surprisingly > heavy, for instance. > That's very true. This small device I have made eights around 6 gramms and the heaviest part is the cable + the 2x3 header: http://www.rudonix.com/devices.html I think it could have been made in a different way shrinking the PCB and also if I were using the 0.8mm PCB instead and a light weight cable and maybe one channel filtering only then the whole lot could have been half of it easily, maybe even more. Also you can use different type of material for PCB that coudl have different weight, like http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/sinodel/product-detailrqsEOTwUEtVF/China-Flexible-PCB.html Tamas -- http://www.mcuhobby.com -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist