On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 05:42, William "Chops" Westfield wrote: > I haven't seen any conversion problems. The biggest compatibility > issue I've seen in in polygons with zero-area "tails." (0,0) (0,1) (1, > 1) (1,0) (2,0) (0,0), which the new version complains about but the > old version would fill properly... I take it as the own-made libraries are no problems to move to Eagle 5. Is the library editor improved or still as crappy as in v4? Creating new parts is really a nightmare due to the unintuitiveness of the program. I'd love to see a library editor with abilities like Proteus Isis, but I bet Cadsoft are still running the conservative lane as ever before - "No matter how many users complains, we don't implement it because we find it good as it is". -- - Rikard - http://bos.hack.org/cv/ -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist