solarwind escreveu: > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Bob Blick wrote: > = >> It depends how you drive the bus. With RS-485, when you enable the >> transmitter, both levels (1 and 0) are actively driven onto the bus. So >> it's basically impossible for a local receiver to detect if a remote >> transmitter is colliding. But in buses where one of the levels is >> passively driven(with a resistor), the local receiver can read the bus >> accurately at all times. The disadvantage to this system is the bus can >> only be made as fast as the passive transistion time. >> = But certainly tens of thousands of bps are possible. I use 19.2 kbps with a "passivated" RS-232 network (every transmitter have a diode in series with the TX pin and the line is pulled down to -12V with a 3k3 resistor) over 100m long. I have installed systems with up to six nodes distributed along the line. I use 19.2 kbps because of system convenience but in tests it worked up to 57.6kbps. For RS-485, I think much higher speeds are possible, even with a passively pulled state. Regards, Isaac >> There are more nuances to it, but that's the basic idea behind what >> people have said. There are also busses that have the best of both >> worlds. >> = > > Thank you. I get it now. > = __________________________________________________ Fa=E7a liga=E7=F5es para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger = http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ = -- = http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist