Olin Lathrop escreveu:
> Isaac Marino Bavaresco wrote:
>   =

>> If the nodes lose connection for too long the sequence numbers may get
>> very far apart
>>     =

>
> You are making this way too complicated.  This is a simple network where
> it's not even clear true peer to peer is needed.  The simply shouldn't se=
nd
> the next command until it receives a ACK for the previous.  There is no n=
eed
> for packets to ever get out of order.  There is no router.  Everything is=
 on
> a single segment.
>   =


As I told in my first post, my approach is for routed networks (I use
TCP/IP over Ethernet).
There was an ongoing discussion about command sequencing and I added my
solution for the problem. Perhaps not exactly what the OP needs but may
interest somebody (as it did).

Regards,

Isaac

__________________________________________________
Fa=E7a liga=E7=F5es para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger =

http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ =


-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist