I spoke to soon, my bad, your are indeed correct.

On May 9, 2009, at 8:04 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:

> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Brian B. Riley <brianbr@mac.com>  
> wrote:
>>  Nope ... 1394 was native (thats is to say it was there in the main
>> body, it didn't have to be selectively invoked) in Win 98.
>
> If you read my post, I mean 1394 kernel debugging is supported
> in XP. I do not think it is the case for Windows 98.
>
>
> -- 
> Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
>
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist