Hmm, two very different replies: On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Herbert Graf wrote: > I2C is specifically designed for that situation. Given that many PICs > have at least some I2C support in hardware I don't see a reason to go > with anything else if the specs of I2C match your requirements. You're saying PICs have good hardware I2C support. Note that I specifically need multi master support. On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Gerhard Fiedler wrote: > Why not CAN for all? I2C multi master is not that simple without good > hardware support (which PICs don't have). And you'll already do all the > work required for CAN, so why not re-use this? And you're saying they don't. I like I2C. But how do I route CAN lines on the PCB? Do I just route them like normal traces? -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist