Xiaofan Chen wrote: > You can still do that (regulating the voltage down). To measure the input > voltage, use a resistor divider and feed that to your voltage monitoring > circuit or an extra circuit. > Let me see if I can clarify this... I have an input on a device, which isn't really able to be changed at this point. It can handle 9-32V input or thereabouts. This two pin input is *both* the source of power for the device, and the spot which is metered. Again, this is not able to be changed. Designed, and in-production device. And the current draw varies quite a bit in some configurations (relays being turned on and off, etc.), so it might be 1/4A at one moment, and a full amp or more the next. So... a simple resistor divider isn't really going to work to take say 18-64V and divide it to stick it into this device. Plus, as the current draw changes, the voltage would change, which is not good. Secondly, the up to 32V drop at an amp or so is 32 watts. Not pretty either. The voltage drop/current thing also applies to *any* linear regulator style device on the front end. I can't be wasting 32watts not doing useful work, not to mention the heat issues. 32W is a lot of heat to dissipate. I realize I could regulate this down to a fixed 24VDC with a switching regulator. I do have this option, and will probably end up doing that, and measuring the voltage in some other way. Just not as 'neat' of a solution from the end-user's standpoint. I would much rather put a 'switching voltage divider' on the front end. Then I don't need any intelligence at all, or any special connections, or anything like that. Just say 'plug your 48VDC in here, and connect this to your existing device'. Voltages get halved, and simple. If it wasn't for the heat issue, I'd just do this with some sort of linear solution. Instead I need a switcher due to the currents involved. -forrest -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist