Hmmm, I was just going by experience with a Garmin consumer grade hiking GPS about 5 years ago. You could literally hold it in your hand, walk a few steps, and it would give you a reasonably accurate heading (say, within 20 deg, although I didn't rigorously test it) A GPS fix has several types of error (this is a rather generic analysis): 1) zero-mean noise on the time-scale of seconds 2) zero-mean noise on the time-scale of minutes/hours 3) a constant (over an hour, say) mean error which depends upon your position, which satellites you see, etc. A single position fix has all three sources of error. Averaging over seconds reduces #1, averaging over hours reduces #2, DGPS partially allows you to eliminate #3. A velocity estimate isn't affected by #3 at all. Some sensible averaging and assumptions about how you can move can be built into the GPS's filtering algorithm so that #1 and #2 are reduced. This leads me to believe that a velocity estimate has the potential to be quite accurate. Sean On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Carl Denk wrote: > Typically a moving type GPS (not a land surveyors or other using DGPS > local station, or averaging over a period of time) =A0will be +/- 30 feet > or so. Lets take an extreme, 60 foot error between readings, along with > 1000 foot of travel, then arc tangent of 60/1000 =3D 3.4 degrees. But the > unit will be taking many readings in a minute. WAAS (or the Russian > equivalent) will be a little better. Some units may average the track > direction. I have used the unit to find cemetery grave markers, after > previously setting a waypoint to the marker with good success, in > particular when after vising several times, each time adjusting the > waypoint =A0location by averaging the old and new locations. I use the map > then to determine what direction to walk. =A0Sorry to say I haven't paid > attention to the track direction indicated, or whether WAAS was active. > > I have a Lowrance Expedition C hand held. For short distances of travel, > say maneuvering in a small parking lot or small street intersection, > trying to figure out the direction of travel, or where you want to go is > not dependable. The unit does have a built in compass which works fine > when =A0a passenger of the foot (walking), but inside a vehicle, is > useless, with errors of 90 degrees or more, even after compensating in > the vehicle. > > Sean Breheny wrote: >> A good GPS >> receiver should be able to get heading info from even fairly slight >> motion - you don't need to drive it down a road. >> > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- = http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist