solarwind <x.solarwind.x <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > What if the fault is the failure to find fault? 
> Then I guess I'm not the only one with that problem.

Failure to find fault is not a failure according to the single fault theorem,
but it guarantees that you will not find the real fault when it occurs :)

> > Now, maybe you *are* Galileo, but then you shouldn't be surprised that
> > people with pitchforks want to burn you at the stake.

In any case, be flattered if the lynch gang goes after you. It will mean that
you tried to change something significant (not necessarily to the better), and
they noticed.
 
> Again with the personal assumptions. For the record, I do have a very
> good job and I'm pleased to brag on this mailing list (though I don't
> know why I bother) that the employers are so satisfied with my
> performance that I have the third highest paying rank where I work.

Er, could we know how many employees that company has, and approximately how
much the next higher paid person makes in your organization, or what job title
he/she has ? :) (just being a little bit evil here)

Of course you know the score about engineering pay and employment prospects now ?

Sorry, I could not abstain any longer,

  Peter


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist