> Interestingly, Planet Analog just published a three part
> article on this topic.
> http://www.planetanalog.com/features/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199905522
>   
Hmm, I was  under the impression that tantalum was lower ESR than 
electrolytic and i've seen datasheets specify "ceramic or tantalum" 
which reinforces this view. But the table in that article puts tantalum 
as a higher ESR than electrolytic.

Can anyone clarify? was I wrong? is this something that has changed with 
recent technical developments?
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist