Gee Russell, you are SO cheery. Is it the water? I was surprised to see "too cheap to meter" attributed to Edison. I remember it being attached to 1950's -era nuclear power plants...There was a wonderful advertisement in Scientific American to that effect, and is one of the reasons I so strongly distrust anything SA ever says... have a good day... --Bob A On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Russell McMahon wrote: > ... >> Mankind =A0will find largely unlimited resources. =A0Carbon, Silicon, et= c. >> that will >> be transformed by nano-technology and cheap power ( solar, fusion, >> zero-point ) >> which will vastly increase productivity. =A0This will happen if ..( snip >> - snip politics ) > ... > > Power too cheap to meter ... > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Edison. > > :-) > > But, yes, better slaves will come. Fusion has been 30 years away for the > last 50 or so. But, it too will come, probably within 30 years :-). > > Antimatter generated by low solar orbit [tm] LASERS summoning it out of t= he > weft of spacetime will power 'our' system hopping shuttles. Mars will be = but > a week or few away, depending on how much energy you want to waste. The > Asteroid belt will rain both Nickel-Iron and Platinum upon us (hopefully = in > a controlled manner), and the lion will lie down with the lamb. > > But, for now, we have to get through the current low point, and it looks > like a bit of a doozy*. > > > =A0 =A0 =A0Russell > > * http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-doo2.htm > > Not quite the usual usage in this ref. > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- = http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist