> On Apr 7, 2009, at 3:53 PM, Matthew Mucker wrote:
>
> I'm happy with the entry level Samsung printers at home. (I have two  
> but
> don't have the model numbers handy.) They're cheap and fast.   
> Frequently
> <$100 at Fry's.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On  
> Behalf Of
> Funny NYPD
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:38 PM
> To: piclist@mit.edu
> Subject: [TECH]Good low cost Laser printer?
>
> I have been using the Minolta Pagepro 1350W Laser printer at home  
> for a long
> time, it is fast, low cost and easy to maintain.
>
> My son has given it a hard time ever since he found this thing can eat
> paper, and most of the plastic parts my son can access are either  
> broken or
> missing because of that, but it still working  great.
>
> I cannot find this particular model on the local market anymore,  
> curious
> what kind of low cost Laser printer you guys are using these days,  
> which can
> substitute My "Pagepro 1350W Laser printer" role in the near future.
>
> I too have another HP P1006 laser printer at home (dedicated for my  
> wife).
> Compare with the Minolta one, it's a loser, low cost but low  
> performance,
> speed is slow compare with 1350W, and toner replacement is not cheap  
> and not
> easy to find.
>
> On my office, the Brother HL-4040CN color laser printer is great.  
> But not
> suit for home use.
>
> Funny N.
> Au Group Electronics, http://www.AuElectronics.com
>

Samsung   ML-2010 works well.  Cost USD $50.   I load my own toner.
MA


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist