1uS - higher is better?  You might want to say lower is better!

Do you mean you are fine with 1M samples per second (bandwidth of
about 500kHz) or you want to be able to resolve a 1MHz signal
(requries minimum 2Msps, but really wants 10Msps)...?

-Adam

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Vitaliy <spam@maksimov.org> wrote:
> We are putting aside some money for a PC-based oscilloscope, which needs to
> have one basic requirement: record long waveforms (several seconds to
> infinity) with a resolution of about 1 us (higher is better).
>
> I have a Tektronix TDS 2014 on my desk, and it's a reasonably good scope,
> but even though it has a high sampling rate, it cannot record long
> waveforms. So I have to zoom out, record a waveform, zoom in on the region
> of interest, and hope that the next time I single sequence, the waveform
> would fall in the same spot.
>
> Ideally, it would be nice if the bundled software could be set up as a
> protocol analyzer, but that is not a requirement.
>
> All suggestions are appreciated.
>
> Vitaliy
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist