Gerhard Fiedler wrote: >>> This is correct, but it doesn't mean that it isn't horribly inefficient >>> when you look at what this does on a larger scale (marketing etc.) -- >>> and that occasionally ranting against it may help increase our >>> collective efficiency and make us -- in the long run, and collectively >>> -- richer. >> >> You could say the same thing about advertizing (I mean, think how many >> billions are wasted!) ... > > I do. > >> ... -- and be just as wrong. > > Just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean that I'm wrong. Marketing and advertizing serve an important function in a free market: they connect sellers with buyers. A capitalist economy cannot function without advertizing -- I hope you're not going to argue the opposite? Next, in a free market, the market forces determine just how much advertizing is "enough". Spending too much on advertizing hurts a company's bottom line, so the process is self-correcting. >> There's nothing wrong with shipping a little popcorn with a PCB order. >> Your PCBs would not cost any less, without the popcorn. Get over it. >> :) > > Maybe not. But don't they say they are buying popcorn by the pallet? At > the source, it's not one popcorn bag wasted, it's a lot of popcorn bags > wasted. Gerhard, put it in context. We're talking about one pallet of popcorn, purchased by a company that ships thousands of orders each month. And the overwhelming majority of its customers enjoy the popcorn. I know that we don't throw it away -- it gets eaten. > This is not only about the money, this is also about waste. (Of > course I know that some call wasting material and energy a way of life, > but I happen not to agree with it -- which is a matter of opinion, I > think, and therefore can't be wrong or right.) No, quite the opposite. I am against waste, too -- so I think our interests are aligned. Planned economies, where advertizing doesn't play much of a role, are the ones that are great at wasting resources. Some bureaucrat decides what gets produced and where, and how to get it from place A to place B. So you have carloads full off stuff that nobody wants, criss-crossing the country, wasting fuel. I prefer the capitalist way. Vitaliy -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist