And as you realise "inexpensive but accurate at 0.05C = impossible" On 12/24/08, Vasile Surducan wrote: > On 12/24/08, Alan B. Pearce wrote: > > >0.05C? 0.5 is hard already. 0.05/40, that means 0.1% accuracy in T! > > > > > >What to calibrate? 3 phase water in 1 atm? to hard. > > > > No, boiling point of water is inaccurate, as it is too hard to hold the > > pressure accurately. > > > No, the steam pressure is constant. He need a boiling water device > with steam collector near ambiant pressure (manufactured for > thermometer calibration) and at least four calibrated thermometers > with better precision than 0.05C. > In my town, the boiling temperature of bidistilated water is between > 99.2 C and 99.8C depending on weather. > > I've made only one 0.05C accuracy thermometer. Resolution of the A2D > is the last problem, there are 100 others. The most difficult one is > to get calibrated thermometers. And to understand the effect of sensor > mounting into the probe. > > Vasile > > > AFAIK all high accuracy accuracy standards use solid to > > liquid phase of various substances. > > > > So to achieve calibration in the OPs range, my suggestion is ice at 0C, and > > gallium at 38.5C (check this one, I am going from memory). There may well be > > others nearer the outer ends of the range he wants to measure. > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist