Matthew Mucker escribi=F3:
> I'd expect that if I select 'none' as a processor type in the IDE, that it
> wouldn't pass a processor command-line switch to the assembler.  I'd need=
 a
> processor directive, or to define the symbol myself, in my source code for
> my code to compile.
> =


I get your point now, but I see it a little bit complicated. =

  Note that you mention assembler and then "code to =

compile". I'm not trying to correct you but to point you =

something important about the IDE.

An assembler file will be "assembled" by MPASM; if your code =

is in C and you choose the C18, Hitech, or any other C or =

Basic or whatever compiler it will be "compiled".

The IDE is a generic tool meant to be used by many =

languages, and if you prefer some kind of manual setting of =

the processor in the code and that should be something that =

any C or pascal or whatever compiler should interpret.  It's =

easier to have a generic code with a single call to the =

compiler/assembler with a parameter to indicate the right =

processor.

Anyway, may be what you are looking for is something like


	list P=3DPIC16F876


That is interpreted by the MPASM.  Is that what you want?

I didn't check it but may be that's your goal.  At least the =

mpasm will warn you that the device used in the MPASM =

parameter is different from the one present in the code.


Regards





------------------------------
Mauricio Giovagnini (Maunix)
www.maunix.com.ar
Cordoba, Arg.
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mgiovagnini
-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist