Admin warning. (Please) **** Stop posting personal abuse onlist.**** on this ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luis Moreira" To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:53 PM Subject: RE: [PIC] Annoying Electric Field? > Hi Guys, > Why are you still wasting your breath? Is obvious he is not listening > hence shall we just stop posting on this? > This as been one of the most annoying set of posts in ages. > Thanks > Luis > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf > Of Joe Bento > Sent: 16 December 2008 14:34 > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > Subject: Re: [PIC] Annoying Electric Field? > > solarwind wrote: >> >> >> I'm sure you don't want to hear this either, but you should RTFP. >> >> I've stated that the same 16F690 chip when pulled from the demo board >> and inserted onto the breadboard works flawlessly. No fancy pullup >> resistors or decoupling capacitors. >> >> >> > > > I wouldn't call those 'fancy' components. Less than 0.05 cents worth of > > parts that should be part of EVERY circuit design whether it be on a PCB > > or breadboard. If you have multiple chips, there should be a 0.1uf cap > at EVERY VCC/VSS line at EVERY chip, as close to the chip as possible. > This is common engineering practice. Don't 'Muntz' your circuits. > (Look that word up. Interesting story behind the name.) > > Joe > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist