On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 10:09 PM, William Chops Westfield <westfw@mac.com> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2008, at 6:01 PM, solarwind wrote:
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/f286b7121
>
>
>         GIE = 0;                //(INTCON[7]) Disable global interrupts
>         RABIE = 1;              //(INTCON[3]) Enable PORTA/PORTB
> change interrupt
>         RABIF = 0;              //(INTCON[0]) Change interrupt flag
> bit - clear
>         C1ON = 0;               //Disable comparators 1 and 2
>         C2ON = 0;
>
> Hmm.  Those are sort of interesting, since the left-side symbols are
> single bits.  Does HTC actually let you do that sort of thing?  I
> mean, it's within what the PIC architecture allows via BSD/BCF
> instructions, and it's within the "extensions" I've seen for some C
> compilers on microcontrollers, but it's clearly not standard C, and
> it's something I'd be suspicious of without seeing it specifically
> used in an example in the manual, or without carefully looking at the
> include files and/or generated code...  I also might tend to avoid
> this syntax as being less portable; it depends on how badly the code
> generator does with more standard C constructs like:
>        INTCON |= INTCON_RABIE;
> or
>        INTCON.RABIE = 1;
>
> BillW
>

If my code logic is correct, the therein lie the problem. But I don't
know if my code logic is correct in the first place...


-- 
..::[ solarwind ]::..
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist