put delay inside adc(), will be correct way.

counting outside, meaningless

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "apptech" <apptech@paradise.net.nz>
To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist@mit.edu>
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 6:54 AM
Subject: [PIC] PIC ADC Sampling Rate


> Swallowed by list manager - reason unknown:
>
>
> From: "Amrish" <amrish_deep@yahoo.com>
> To: <piclist@mit.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 11:57 AM
> Subject: [PIC] PIC ADC Sampling Rate
>
>
>
>
>  Hi all,
>
>  We are using the following code to read the adc value from the PIC using
>
>  Internal clock frequency.
>
>  for(i=0;i<50000;i++)
>  {
>  a = read_adc();
>  printf("%lu",a);
>  }
>
>  The above code snippet takes > 200s to execute and I am unable to acheive
>
>  the sampling rate of around 10,000 samples/s. Is this the right way to
>
>  sample analog signals using PIC?
>
>  *** We are using PIC to perform ADC on sound waves sensed using
>
>  microphone.
>
>  -Amrish
>  -- 
>  View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/PIC-ADC-Sampling-Rate-tp20641430p20641430.html
>  Sent from the PIC - [PIC] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist