> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Martin K <martin@nnytech.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Right, so what's the point in this context of a enhanced 16F that's
> slightly
> >> cheaper than a 18F?
> >
> > "slightly cheaper" is the point.
> =

> Microchip agrees with you. ;-)
> =


Another thing that this is good for is that you might be able to reuse an o=
ld =

design for something else. Whenever I need to do this it seems that I almos=
t =

always need more code space than the original design. If it already has a =

standard 16F, you can just pop in an enhanced 16F which has more code and r=
am =

memory. This way you have a proven design and may even be able to use the o=
ld =

test reports for safety and EMC. "Just" change the code.

/Ruben
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Ruben J=F6nsson
AB Liros Electronic
Box 9124, 200 39 Malm=F6, Sweden
TEL INT +46 40142078
FAX INT +46 40947388
ruben@pp.sbbs.se
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist