Tamas Rudnai wrote:
>> I mistyped, it should be "static stack". That's a stack that is
>> pre-calculated at compile time, so it can use fixed adresses at run
>> time. But this does not permit recursion or reentrancy.
> 
> That is what I call overlayed memory usage - that is not even a stack. In my
> opinion it is much better what C18 do, it does not try to figure out what I
> want, but I can trigger this option by the storage specifier 'overlay':

I don't think the world cares much how you call it - it is commonly 
called "stactic stack allocation" or something similar. In the absence 
of re-entry and recursion it is )for the user)m indistinguishable from a 
"real" stack.

-- 

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist