Interesting.  I tend to think a lot of classes (that I've been to in the
past) are usually on the slower side, possibly to account for everyone's
paces.  So I suspect I'll think this too.  But since you say it's "certainly
worth my time and money", I think I'll give it a shot.  I know if I start
sifting through forums etc to learn this stuff it will get frustrating.  And
I yet have to find a good practical tutorial book on the subject --
specifically learning USB with PICs.  So far is all generic knowledge of the
internals of how USB works internally, or datasheets etc.

Cheers,
-Neil.



Vitaliy-2 wrote:
> 
> Neil,
> 
> I took the class this summer. I can't say it was great, but it wasn't bad 
> either -- certainly worth my time and money (my prior USB experience was 
> rather limited). Another guy from our company said that the pace of the 
> presentation could have been increased x3, and I agree with him. This was 
> the first paid Microchip class I attended (about three weeks before the 
> Conference).
> 
> The Microchip folks never check to make sure you've completed the 
> prerequisites, and my theory is that the prerequisites are there so that 
> when someone starts complaining that the material is "too hard", the pace
> is 
> "too fast", or begins to ask stupid questions and slowing down the rest of 
> the class, the instructor can say "you should take the prerequisites".
> Never 
> seen it happen, though.
> 
> Vitaliy 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Microchip-USB-class-tp20042292p20054932.html
Sent from the PIC - [PIC] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist