Vitaliy wrote:
>>> Same goes for the two concepts we're discussing: ignore them at your
>>> peril.
>>
>> Yes, once North Korea is evil, then "Loose coupling" and "tight
>> cohesion" are always good. That's the reason.
>
> Based on your post history, you are clearly a provocateur.  I'll pretend I
> didn't read your crazy rant. :-)

Somewhat better - no politics and a bit of humor (smiley) , but,
still, "provocateur", "crazy", - this dark ages terminology marks you
out the western crowd. (No pun intended, just providing a constructive
feedback)


>> "We"- who? Let's take a generic experienced embed systems developer.
...
> We -- you, me, Olin, anyone who has ever written computer code.

Again, don't talk for all mankind. They use to honour diversity in opinions.


> I know that Olin knows and applies the concepts, even if he does not refer
> to them by the same name. He is not a "cowboy programmer", sometimes I feel
> he may even be too systematic in his approach to programming.

Olin is a smart person. Of course, he does do many things in a right
way even without the formal knowledge of zillions underlying concepts
(except for the concept how to treat newbies, it seems, it's still to
get mastered by him :-)

Sincere.
(Again, no pun intended, just providing a constructive feedback)
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist